accepted with minor revisions

Yes, characterizing revisions as "minor" strongly suggests that if you make those revisions the paper will be accepted. Editors may prefer not to... I got an an article in a journal recently accepted with minor revisions. Yes, that happens very often. While “major revision” at some journals entail that it’s expected to be accepted (assuming that the authors actually... Positive reviews and the reviewer’s name will be published alongside the article. No, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Hero}, title = {Optimal sequential energy allocation for inverse problems,” accepted with minor revisions to}, booktitle = {in Signal Processing}, year = {2007}} Their combined opinions of your manuscript can lead the editor to select one of the following options: accept ´as is´ which is a very rare decision; accept pending They raised questions which had they read the paper they would have the answer too. (In any case, I am confident that JVP does not tell its authors “reject” when the paper is really accepted with minor revisions.) You have received one recommendation for major and one for minor revisions. Of the articles that were sent out for review, reviewer recommendations strongly influenced the outcome of the review process and the decisions by the editors. After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. 6) is particularly well-suited for illustrating the practical benefits of the approach. One major revision and several minor revisions needed. Mainly, it was only one table which needed amendments. Accepted subject to revision is not the same as accepted. An article of mine happened to be accepted pending minor revisions … This is … 4. The editors of the Journal of Monetary Economics have concluded that your paper contains a contribution that is publishable when a small list of specified revisions is successfully executed. Glad it turned out OK. Accept with minor revisions: the paper will have to be slightly revised following the reviewers' comments, but there will not be any additional round of review, only the section Editor and/or the Editor-in-Chief will check the modifications. Minor revisions consists of text changes, usually toning down of claims, additions to the materials and methods, and added discussion, and often addition of missing controls. I think the second reviewer suggested either a major revision or reject I couldn’t tell from their comments what they wanted. Next Article News in brief… For a review journal like The Lancet Neurology , it is rather worrying that the results of a cohort analysis published recently in the BMJ suggest that review articles are not as accurate and reliable as most clinicians think ( BMJ 2003; 327 : 266). However, as the editor has mentioned, you need to consider the reviewer comments very carefully, and provide point-by-point responses. This is a change from prior practice. ACCEPTED PAPERS & PAPERS ACCEPTED WITH MINOR REVISIONS. Nothing potentially game changing. This type of decision outcome is rare; Accept with minor revisions (acceptance): The journal will publish the paper and asks the author to make small corrections. Reply. Reviewing: Major Revision or Reject? The answer depends on the associate editor, and mostly on you. Imagine you drastically change your manuscript at this stage, not taking into accoun... It was one crazy, stressful month getting it done! No, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts... Minor revision means that your paper accepted by about 70 % but not final acceptance until you fix further comments. Time varies from journal to ot... 1. 3. Register Online You MUST register before uploading your final paper. Reviewer recommendations of accept and minor revision were similar in their positive effects on editor decisions, while papers receiving at least one recommendation of reject (“the kiss of death”) were almost always rejected. This indicates that there is relatively little difference in the impact of recommendations for accept and a minor revisions on the acceptance rate of a paper. Papers having two reviewers’ recommendations to accept and 2. If your manuscript is not immediately rejected, it will be read and commented on by two to four peer reviewers. Example, “The paper is well written, presents new matter, and can be published with minor revisions: ... to be done systematically so that the re-submission is a definitive “re-write” and not just a collection of “minor” revisions. This will give the Editor a chance to review the revisions. Whether one or more of the reviewers needs to examine the revisions is up to the Editor. Hi Emma, Eek, that does sound full on! There is a 100% acceptance rate for papers receiving combinations of accept–accept (N = 4) and accept–minor revision (N = 54); and a 98% acceptance rate for minor–minor (N = 189). Papers will be included in the proceedings only if at least one author has registered and paid the registration fee by August 12, 2019. Yes. The paper can get rejected after a major revision. Once you submit the paper after major revision, your paper is assigned to the same reviewer... From a student: Sometime when you have a few cycles to spare, could you give me some advice on the difference between a revise-and-resubmit and an outright reject decision? Unfortunately yes. A friend of mine once submitted a paper to a top journal in computer science. In the first round, he got an "accept with major r... Fair. One week is not too soon. The Editor is a professor too and may be away for the week at a conference. Or, depending on the time of the semester,... Anne Says: October 4, 2012 at 1:47 pm. 5. Editors are not using “accept” in connection with a manuscript, unless the paper is in its absolutely final version. Until a paper is accepted, it can be subject to further review. In the case of major revisions it means that the paper will definitely be re-review... If there are minor revisions that need to be made, the "accept with minor revisions" should be used. Jan 4, 2017. Rejection 3. Major Revision you say ? I had a paper that was rejected after a “Minor Revision”. The paper had three reviews, all good. Apparently, one of the or... Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. Resubmission with major revisions Five issues that affect flexibility of … BibTeX @MISC{Wei_acceptedwith, author = {Yun Wei and Chuanyi Ji and Floyd Galvan and Stephen Couvillon and George Orellana and James Momoh}, title = {Accepted with minor revisions by TNNLS Special Issue on Learning in Nonstationary and Evolving Environments Learning Geo-Temporal Non-Stationary Failure and Recovery of Power Distribution}, year = {}} Rejection, with suggestion to submit to specialty journal or another journal by the same publisher. Each paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. Finally, the numerical example (Sect. If you address the reviewers’ concerns satisfactorily, your paper stands a fair chance of getting accepted. My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. – Fred Douglis Apr 17 '17 at 16:26 Journal extension accepted to Science of Computer Programming with minor revisions By Raffi Khatchadourian in Papers on February 26, 2020 . Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. As Quora User indicates, a major revision of a paper will almost always go back to the original reviewers to see if the revisions respond to their... Typically, a minor revisions recommendation implies that the reviewer has only “suggestions” (i.e., not “deal breaker”) comments. Good. The revised submission must be submitted in the next cycle, along with a brief response to the reviewers’ comments. Until a paper is accepted, it can be subject to further review. Excerpts from a conversation in 2003. BibTeX @INPROCEEDINGS{Rangarajan07optimalsequential, author = {Raghuram Rangarajan and Student Member and Raviv Raich and Alfred O. That is sometimes now called just Minor Revisions, or more often, just Revisions. It means your paper includes enough new knowledge that it has been accepted for publication pending minor revisions. Accepted with revisions is absolutely acceptable on an update letter. In my experience these will always be accepted once the changes have been made. As an added bonus, the “minor revision” is really minor – just shortening part of the discussion, and the targeted part really doesn’t do much for the paper itself anyway. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions.Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. Question on 'accepted pending minor revisions'. Articles are accepted or rejected in their first round, with only minor revisions requested. • Accepted, pending revisions You have a letter of acceptance subject to the condition that you make certain changes required by the editor. Paper requires multiple minor revisions, but I commend this paper to the Editor-in-Chief. I received minor revisions from one reviewer, they took the time to read line by line and comment (very few comments). Editors will go through the revisions and gives a final approval. Acceptance with minor revisions As the author of a manuscript which has received an accept with minor revisions decision, you are to be congratulated. For papers 'accepted after minor revision', papers are returned to corresponding authors for minor revision. And resubmitted papers are published without another full process of peer-review but subjected to acceptable explanations for the points raised by referees. doctoralwriting said: September 20, 2013 at 7:01 pm. Please follow these instructions for submitting your paper if your manuscript review is Accepted with Major Revisions or Accepted with Minor Revisions.You must: 1) meet the June 22 deadline and 2) you must submit a Comments Addressed document along with your final manuscript to be considered for the FIE conference. Minor revision sent back to reviewers. 如题，最近在一国际会议上投了篇文章，Accepted or Rejected一栏的结题是Accepted (with minor revision)，然后在Review Result一栏里面给出了几条意见。这是不是说明文章已确定被录用了，但还要根据审稿意见做些修改就行了？ 返回小木虫查看更多 If the substantive revisions are acceptable, then a manuscript is given an accept with minor revisions decision, which is applied when the associate editor and supervisory editor no longer have substantive concerns but the supervisory editor has remaining concerns about the quality of the manuscript’s exposition or its consistency with JME style. It's not yet confirmed as to appear. Poor. Very few articles are accepted outright, except for J Exp Med. The paper will be accepted only if the editors are satisfied with the changes made. Furthermore, the methodology is sound with proofs in the appendix. Very good. Minor revision usually implies that the reviewers (and the editor) think that authors can correct the paper in a way that will address all of the c... 7. Yes. Less likely. My favorite horror story has to do with a paper that was submitted, was mostly copied and published with a different author, and... • Submitted You have sent the typescript to a potential 6. In the case of major revisions it means that the paper will definitely be re-reviewed, as the editors are generally not qualified to evaluate the revisions. Unfortunately, yes. Sometimes, there is a disconnect between what you have in mind and what the professor has in mind. even with a conference, it c... Papers with more consistent reviews (e.g. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. The paper will be accepted only if the editor is satisfied with the changes made. 3. Accept with major revisions: An editor arrives at this decision when a manuscript needs to be substantially improved before it can be accepted. The arXiv approach is another matter, but it still wouldn't be appropriate to mention the journal if it is pending revision. This morning, I got an email with the far more elusive “accepted with minor revision” decision for a paper. The review process is mostly transparent: The author's name will be shared with reviewers. Due June 22, 2018. Satisfactory. Since the editor didn't do this, it's still possible your paper will be declined. Usually, if your paper receive the decision “accept with minor modifications”, there is a high chance that your paper will be accepted if you address the comments well. • Revise and resubmit The publisher has returned reviewers’ comments and suggests you revise accordingly and resubmit for further consideration. Yes. When an editor sends a paper back for major revisions, it means they think it may be suitable for their journal after quite a lot more work. A... (Accepted with minor revisions to Laser and Photonics Reviews) Amir Rosenthal*, Stephan Kellnberger, Dmitry Bozhko, Andrei Chekkoury, Murad Omar, Daniel Razansky, and Vasilis Ntziachristos Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging (IBMI),Technische Universität München and Helmholtz I submitted the revisions within a few days, and thought that the editor would deal with them quickly. Peer review—reject, accept, or major revision? ACCEPTED PAPERS & PAPERS ACCEPTED WITH MINOR REVISIONS 1. « on: September 16, 2009, 6:56:32 am ». Minor revision: Submissions that receive this decision will require some revisions before being accepted for publication. Help! Congratulations on your achievement. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts your paper and leaves you to make the remaining changes during proofs. Papers will be included in the proceedings only if at least one author has registered and paid the registration fee by August 11, 2018. So to recap, if, upon first review, the editor making the recommendation could see that the changes required were only minor, then he/she might have inserted a … Some minor revisions needed. Yes, characterizing revisions as "minor" strongly suggests that if you make those revisions the paper will be accepted. Accept after discretionary revisions. #4. An Resubmission with minor revisions 5. The big problem for us was minor revision have a one month turnaround, while major revisions allowed three months. Instances of … Posts: 17. Make sure to include your ref Id # and journal to your update. However, it is good to remember that "this status decision" does not guarantee acceptance. As a result, the author will need to submit another revision of the paper. : Revise and resubmit: it is agreed that the topic is worth publishing, but the paper requires large revisions before it can actually be published. One can say the paper is more likely to be accepted than not, but the paper is not accepted until you receive the acceptance letter. Minor revision means that your paper accepted by about 70 % but not final acceptance until you fix further comments. Time varies from journal to others, but within one month. Register Online. Accept without any changes (acceptance): The journal will publish the paper in its original form. You should recommend minor revisions if the paper’s contributions and methods are clear and the paper is close to being publishable. You MUST register before uploading your final paper. Several minor revisions needed. 4. A very short answer for this is: a paper can get rejected any time for whatever reason; live with it. Journals are run by editors, often supported... Situation 1: Accept with Minor Revision. Reviewer #2: Minor Revision • “The paper is well written, provides the necessary background information and step-wise introduces the new approach.